The Park and Ride site at Shaw and Crompton on the Oldham and Rochdale Metrolink line has expanded with an extra 46 parking spaces now available to passengers. The original car park here had 44 parking spaces but an extra site was obtained by Oldham Council to allow for this expansion to take place.
-
British Trams Online is always on the look out for news and photos from tramways across the British Isles. Whether it be a tram being delivered, a new livery or any other piece of news we want to hear from you! All submissions should be sent to gareth@britishtramsonline.co.uk. As well as topical news and photos we are also still seeking archive photos for our Picture in Time series. Thanks to everyone who does send submissions.
All news carried on these pages is provided in good faith and is correct to the best of our knowledge. If you notice any errors please let us know either by leaving a comment or by email.
Opinions expressed on these pages are those of writer(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of British Trams Online or any organisations we are associated with.
If posting comments to any news articles please read these guidelines which will help us to keep a harmonious community. All comments will be reviewed before publishing and may be subject to editing.
For details of our Privacy Policy please click the following link: Privacy Policy
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- John on In Pictures: Overhead back all the way to North Station
- Count Otto Von Dusseldorf on In Pictures: Overhead back all the way to North Station
- RD Talbot on In Pictures: Overhead back all the way to North Station
- Count Otto Von Dusseldorf on In Pictures: Overhead back all the way to North Station
- John on Coventry Very Light Rail scheme has bid for funding rejected
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- November 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- September 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
Categories
- 15 Events
- 15 Years Apart
- Aberdeen Corporation Transport 15
- Aberystwyth Cliff Railway
- Advert Up Close
- Amman Valley Railway Society
- Around the World in Trams
- Bath and Bristol
- Beamish Tramway
- Birkenhead Heritage Tramway
- Black Country Living Museum
- Blackpool Tramway
- Brighton Tram 53 Group
- British Trams Online at 15
- Burton & Ashby 14
- Bury Transport Museum
- Cardiff Metro
- Cliff Lifts
- Cork Luas
- Crich line-ups
- Crich Tramway Village
- Docklands Light Railway
- Douglas Bay Horse Tramway
- Dublin Luas
- East Anglia Transport Museum
- Edinburgh Trams
- Electric 50 – Crich 2014
- Event Previews
- Event Reviews
- Feature Articles
- Fleetwood Heritage Leisure Trust
- Fylde Tramway Society
- Fylde Transport Trust
- General
- Glasgow Airport link
- Going for a ride
- Great Orme Tramway
- Heaton Park Tramway
- Hull Streetlife Museum
- Hythe Pier Railway
- Ipswich Transport Museum
- Isle of Wight Steam Railway – Ryde Pier Tramway 2
- KenEx Tram
- Leeds Tram
- Leeds Transport Historical Society
- Llandudno & Colwyn Bay Electric Railway Society
- Loan Trams
- Lockdown Walks
- London Trams
- London Transport Museum
- Lost Trams
- Lytham 43
- Manchester Metrolink
- Manx Electric Railway
- Models
- North Eastern Electrical Transport Trust
- Nottingham Express Transit
- Opinion
- Out and About
- People
- Picture in Time
- Preston Trampower
- Random A-Z of Trams
- Reviews
- Ryde Pier Tramway
- Sandtoft Trolleybus Museum
- Scenic T68s
- Seaton Tramway
- September 2018 Review
- Site News
- Snaefell Mountain Railway
- So nearly, not quite!
- South Yorkshire Supertram
- Southampton Tram Project
- Southend Pier Railway/Tramway
- Still Standing!
- Stop by Stop
- Summerlee Museum Tramway
- Support our Heritage Tramways
- Television
- The Number 20
- Then & Now
- They Ran in 2019
- They Ran in 2020
- They Ran in 2021
- They Ran in 2022
- They Ran in 2023
- They Ran in 2024
- Tram of the Year
- Tram Pub Signs
- Trams &
- Trams in Unusual Places
- Trams in Video
- Trams Up Close
- Tyne and Wear Metro
- UKTram
- Ulster Transport Museum
- Uncategorized
- Very Light Rail
- Visitor's Guide
- Volk's Electric Railway
- West Midlands Metro
- Whatever Happened To?
- World Cup of Trams
Meta
Let’s hope the recently identified nonsense of overnight usage of the park and rides is soon consigned to history, and the fact of multi day journeys being a regular factor in travellers lives is recognised – rather than being the subject of dead of night raids by parking contractors to catch the unwary.
Metrolink have explained that the ban on overnight parking is, amongst other things, to ensure as far as possible that spaces are available for early morning travellers. Certainly at Milnrow for one it is virtually impossible to get a parking space after 0700hrs as it is. I suspect the only way to allow cars to be left overnight is to start charging for use of car parks, which would also deter non-users of the system from parking in the car parks where there are pubs adjacent for example. As for catching out the unwary, unpopular as the rule is, people only get ‘caught out’ if they don’t read the signs put there for their benefit, or more likely decide that rules don’t apply to them. I don’t agree with the present situation, but if people don’t like the rules they do have the choice not to use Metrolink.
“if people don’t like the rules they do have the choice not to use Metrolink”
Ken, if you believe that then you are a disgrace to the concept of customer service. Why must all business meetings be out and back in a day? Why must social evenings be curtailed just to get a car off a car park and restrict the participants to one glass of wine or beer? No – this is a nonsensical restriction based on giving the parking contractor some undeserved income and nothing to do with capacity or need.
The suggestion that Milnrow sets the bench mark is just silly. Go to Derker, or Mumps, or Hollinwood or Ashton Moss. I have never failed to get a space at any of the above – and let’s be honest – We all know that Mumps is well used by people who never go near a tram.
Metrolink needs someone to give its attitude to its users a complete revamp – then it may become fit for purpose – it isn’t now.
Frank, I believe that because it is an INDISPUTABLE FACT, clearly in your world people don’t have a right not to use Metrolink. I am not anything to customer service, I do not work for Metrolink. I am just a customer who finds it spectacularly easy to comply with the simple, well-publicised rules. You clearly didn’t read my comments properly as I clearly stated that I do not actually wholly agree with the restriction. Season ticket holders by definition have a ticket which is valid beyond one day and in my opinion should be issued with parking permits for their local stop. “If you park on this land contravening the above parking restrictions you are agreeing to pay a parking charge to the sum of £100” is clearly stated on the signs. If people are not happy with the situation, then the solution is to campaign for a change in the regulations as has successfully been done with regard to mobility scooters and is currently being done with regard to dogs, not to just ignore the rules and expect to get away with it. When these people get back to their home station after their night out they clearly get a taxi or walk home, if it was me I would make my way to the tram stop by the same method in the first place. I am intrigued by the notion that if people don’t like rules they can change them just by ignoring them and expecting the penalties to not be enforced. And I never said that Milnrow was a ‘benchmark’, hence the carefully worded ‘at Milnrow for one’, but referred to it because I keep my comments to what I KNOW.
This issue is obviously currently a contentious one and has probably been poorly handled.
However if I may be so bold as to make some comments Frank.
Firstly and sadly it is a fact that there are those around us that are only too happy to abuse facilities provided for the use of genuine fare paying passengers and it makes good sense to try to manage the misuse. As an example, for a long time the car park at Bury has suffered from misuse and has been crying out for some form of control. Unfortunately as is often the case applying measures to try to control abuse by a minority penalises a number of genuine users and this is a sad fact of life.
Secondly we all have only ourselves to blame if we fail to read the notices placed around the car parks before leaving our vehicles. As with most rules and laws ignorance is no defence. I think that the application of these rules now is more than likely a measure being taken to nip a perceived problem in the bud before it becomes a major problem. There are are perhaps some locations where inter day parking is needed.
Metrolink does have a problem with Customer Service I would agree but to then carry that over to roundly condemn the system as not fit for purpose is absurd. The attitude to Customer Service in this country is in general poor and Metrolink is probably average in this respect. In no way does that mean it shouldn’t improve itself. The biggest problem is that in my opinion the standards required of the operator by their contract are not policed effectively by the client. Complaints to TfGM seem to get passed on straight to the operator rather than being investigated by TfGM. I believe that initial complaints should be routed to the operator and then if no satisfactory response is given an approach should be made to TfGM for their independent investigation. It is this that would make the operator think about their actions in a more customer related way. At present the relationship seems to be too cosy.
However having said that, Metrolink is fit for purpose as indicated by the ridership and overcrowding problems on some lines, like any public transport network it has its faults but within the funding constraints which exist in what successive governments call ‘the regions’ I for one think it does a good job.
I do sometimes get the impression from your comments Frank that anything which is a traditional tram is in your opinion to be condemned out of hand..
Apologies the final sentence of my comment above should have read ‘I do sometimes get the impression from your comments Frank that anything which is not a traditional tram is in your opinion to be condemned out of hand.’
I seem to be missing something here. The car park is a park and ride, therefore by definition it is quite sensible to expect to be able to park your car just before the 1st tram of the day, likewise it makes sense to still be open to collect it after last tram of the day. I therefore cannot see why there is a need to park there overnight in connection with the tramway.
There isn’t. It is interesting that in support of his ‘never had any problem finding a parking space’ Frank has picked out 4 specific car parks, of which the 3 with which I am familiar (on the Rochdale line) are amongst, if not the largest Metrolink car parks on the whole system, while he chooses to ignore the far greater number of car parks located at former railway stations, which like the instance I referred to only have about 20 or 30 spaces. Apart from anything else I would much prefer my car to overnight at home than in an unsupervised car park, Metrolink or not. Unfortunately it is commonplace these days for people to expect something for nothing in addition to their contract that they have entered into. Instead of which we ehould be grateful that at the moment parking at Metrolink stations is free, which is not very common. One station that I think would warrant an exception is Rochdale, where TfGM have stated that the car park is for the use of railway passengers holding valid rail tickets, but I would say is warranted because the arrival of Metrolink removed a considerable number of unrestricted on-road parking spaces, Rochdale station never having had a car park of its own. But I end my contibution to this particular debate exactly where I started: whether you think it is right or not, if you ignore the clearly-displayed restrictions then you can expect to be subjected to the equally clearly-displayed penalties. Alternatively if you are catching the tram to Manchester to travel onward by train on business or whatever and don’t like the restrictions in the free Metrolink car parks, you can show your disapproval by bypassing Metrolink, and drive to Manchester Piccadilly and park there for as long as you want at a cost of about £20 per day!
I think what Frank and others who have made complaints to Metrolink are saying Steve, is that there may be occasions where a driver might park their car during service hours and then perhaps imbibe, shall we say over the limit making it impossible to drive the car on their return. In this event said driver would want to leave the car overnight and collect it next day.
I am so sorry – I had clean forgotten that we now live in the compliance society and that every rule or notice, no matter how arcane must be taken as gospel.
Well sorry guys – you follow that mantra if you want! I predate it, have a mind of my own, understand plain common sense and am prepared to stand up for it, and when I see a mean minded little bit of car parking contractor’s pocket lining like this see it for what it is and not some spurious protective precaution preventing the overnight overcrowding of Park and Ride facilities – as if!
Park and Ride should encourage use of a system – not leave users feeling abused and ripped off!