{"id":16466,"date":"2009-05-31T12:36:05","date_gmt":"2009-05-31T12:36:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/?p=16466"},"modified":"2017-01-24T12:44:03","modified_gmt":"2017-01-24T12:44:03","slug":"crich50-the-workshop-view","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/?p=16466","title":{"rendered":"Crich50 &#8211; The Workshop View"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As a bonus to the normal article on the events of the Sunday of the Crich50 celebrations we now present an article from Jack Gordon. Jack, as well as being the editor of Tramways Monthly, was volunteering in the Workshop on the day and provides his perspective on the day and also a short write-up of what happened on the final day of the Bank Holiday Weekend (when he was volunteering as a conductor &#8211; he certainly gets about!)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Arriving at about 9.20 on Sunday morning things were already moving about, with <strong>Electric Loco 717<\/strong> moving <strong>TW3<\/strong> to release <strong>GMJ<\/strong> &#8211; or should I say Ted? \u2013 for its duty later in the day. <strong>TW3<\/strong> was then put back in the depot with <strong>717<\/strong> soon replaced. The schizophrenic <strong>GMJ<\/strong>\/<strong>Ted<\/strong> was then moved in front of the workshop extension where it remained until its duty.<\/p>\n<p>It was relatively quiet then until the tram crews started getting their trams out \u2013 this saw trams being seen all over the fan that were then being put away. At one stage <strong>Berlin 3006<\/strong> was in front of the workshop and this needed to be moved quickly to enable <strong>Sheffield 15<\/strong> to be released for its trip to Wakebridge carrying the \u201cFifty-Niners\u201d behind <strong>GMJ<\/strong>\/<strong>Ted<\/strong>. All was solved though and <strong>15<\/strong> was hand shunted and <strong>GMJ<\/strong>\/<strong>Ted<\/strong> brought up in behind it before setting off for Town End \u2013 it departed at around noon being followed by <strong>Leeds 399<\/strong>. On its return to the depot fan <strong>15<\/strong> was hand-shunted into the depot and <strong>GMJ<\/strong>\/<strong>Ted<\/strong> was sent to the centre siding, where it remained for most of the rest of the day.<\/p>\n<p>Shortly before this the first photo opportunity of the day had been set up, with <strong>Sheffield 330<\/strong> and <strong>Sheffield 189<\/strong> both being extracted from Depot V and being placed beside each other. During this time other trams were displayed on the fan as mentioned above, including my personal favourite <strong>MET 331<\/strong>, which did un-authentically carry the \u201cEnfield Town\u201d destination briefly! There were also many questions about when <strong>Cardiff 131<\/strong> would appear out of the workshop \u2013 to which we responded \u201call in good time\u201d!<\/p>\n<p>After about an hour in the open, <strong>Sheffield 189<\/strong> was then replaced in Depot V, and it was time to get <strong>Cardiff 131<\/strong> in the open! Opportunity was taken to pose the two Crich water cars together, and <strong>131<\/strong> was driven round next to <strong>330<\/strong>, making a \u201crequest\u201d stop along the way for a group of photographers.<\/p>\n<p>Then, it was time for the main event of the day \u2013 a cavalcade of all the working trams. Three pages of text were written to describe how the cavalcade would work, with trams heading to various places \u2013 the newest to Glory Mine, others to Wakebridge, and some only as far as Cliffside. Unfortunately, this cavalcade ended up being delayed by over an hour by a spectacular dewirement of <strong>Sheffield 330<\/strong> as we were moving it to the workshop to enable trams behind to be prepared for the cavalcade. The wire bounce also dewired <strong>Leeds 399<\/strong>. Nevertheless, after assessing the situation (a very bent trolley pole!) <strong>330<\/strong> was moved to the workshop and had its trolley straightened out allowing it to take part in the cavalcade.<\/p>\n<p>For the cavalcade I had been assigned to <strong>330<\/strong>, and we soon set off following <strong>MET 331<\/strong> \u2013 I was naturally pleased! Once the rest of the cars behind us \u2013 <strong>Paisley 68<\/strong> and <strong>Southampton 45<\/strong> \u2013 caught up, we headed back towards Town End, waiting for the call down to the street. Over twenty trams were involved in the cavalcade \u2013 stretching right back to the Bowes Lyon Bridge \u2013 and a full list is at the end of this article.<\/p>\n<p>After the cavalcade there followed the mammoth task of getting everything back where it belonged: passenger trams either back in service or to the depot, <strong>330<\/strong> back into Depot V and <strong>131<\/strong> behind <strong>GMJ<\/strong>\/<strong>Ted<\/strong> on the centre siding.<\/p>\n<p>After the organised chaos had subsided, it was time for the next line up of the day \u2013 the capitals line-up! Postman Pat was duly taken over to Track 11, where cars such as <strong>1297<\/strong>, <strong>106<\/strong> and <strong>35<\/strong> normally reside, and set about extracting <strong>Edinburgh 35<\/strong> and <strong>Hill of Howth 10<\/strong>. <strong>Cardiff 21<\/strong>, the visiting horse car, was also extracted from Depot V and kept on the traverser. Unfortunately there was a slight delay in London being represented as <strong>London Transport 1622<\/strong> was delayed at Glory Mine because of a snapped trolley rope. Despite my hints to use <strong>MET 331<\/strong> instead, <strong>1622<\/strong> was soon displayed to the north of <strong>35<\/strong>. Because of this delay and the fact that we were already a good hour behind schedule, the line-up did not last as long as planned, as <strong>1622<\/strong> needed to be removed from the line-up to allow <strong>Cardiff 131<\/strong> to be brought forward and displayed next to <strong>Cardiff 21<\/strong>. This saw quite a bit of shunting to get <strong>1622<\/strong> to the centre stub and <strong>131<\/strong> alongside <strong>21<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Towards the end of the day <strong>131<\/strong> ventured onto the mainline again, as well as giving rides to various people \u2013 including myself and a couple of other BTO contributors. Despite nudges from us the BTO webmaster refused! (Webmaster&#8217;s note: in my defence I was a little concerned by this time of how I was getting back to Derby as East Midlands Trains drivers had decided not to work on this day and so I was having to catch a dreaded bus!) During this time <strong>21<\/strong>, <strong>10<\/strong> and <strong>35<\/strong> were returned to the depots where they came from.<\/p>\n<p>By the end of the day, trams were all over the place (Well&#8230; at the start of the day really!), with <strong>London 106<\/strong> being in the Exhibition Hall on the Trade Stand normally occupied by <strong>Howth 10<\/strong> and <strong>Glasgow 1297<\/strong> was also in the Exhibition Hall behind <strong>Glasgow 1282<\/strong>. It was possible to see <strong>1297<\/strong> as well as <strong>1<\/strong>, <strong>264<\/strong>, <strong>DHMD 1<\/strong> and <strong>102<\/strong> as the Exhibition Hall doors had been opened. There was also one more job left to be done \u2013 re-unite <strong>GMJ<\/strong>\/<strong>Ted<\/strong> with the other \u201c<strong>GMJ<\/strong>\u201d nameplate \u2013 the \u201c<strong>Ted<\/strong>\u201d \u2018plate has been removed and placed in store.<\/p>\n<p>So, was it a good event? For me, definitely. This is only the fourth \u201cbig\u201d event i\u2019ve been to at Crich \u2013 and to be fair two of them (Tramathon and Enthusiasts\u2019 \u201908) I didn\u2019t really see much off.<\/p>\n<p>So, therefore, the official British Trams Online Rating is:<\/p>\n<p><strong>4.8<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Trams in the Cavalcade (in order):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cardiff 131<\/p>\n<p>Leeds 399<\/p>\n<p>Leeds 345<\/p>\n<p>Glasgow 812<\/p>\n<p>Paisley 68<\/p>\n<p>Southampton 45<\/p>\n<p>Sheffield 330<\/p>\n<p>MET 331<\/p>\n<p>Liverpool 869<\/p>\n<p>Glasgow 22<\/p>\n<p>Blackpool \u2018Rack\u2019 2<\/p>\n<p>Blackpool 40<\/p>\n<p>Johannesburg 60<\/p>\n<p>Blackpool Electric Loco 717<\/p>\n<p>Blackpool \u2018Toastrack\u2019 166<\/p>\n<p>Sheffield 74<\/p>\n<p>Chesterfield 7<\/p>\n<p>London Transport 1622<\/p>\n<p>Oporto 273<\/p>\n<p>Berlin 3006<\/p>\n<p><strong>Other Trams on the mainline:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sheffield 15<\/p>\n<p>GMJ\/Ted<\/p>\n<p><strong>Other trams on display:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cardiff 21<\/p>\n<p>Hill of Howth 10<\/p>\n<p>Edinburgh 35<\/p>\n<p>By my count that gives a massive 26 trams outside on the day \u2013 one more than the TMS50 celebrations four years ago!<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Monday 25th May 2009<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>While not enough happened to warrant a whole article, the Monday was very busy, and saw an intensive 6-minute service with five trams and the AccessTram. There were probably about a 700 visitors on site, and there was also a tractor display as well as some workshop shunting. Trams in service were <strong>Chesterfield 7<\/strong>, <strong>Southampton 45<\/strong>, <strong>Paisley 68<\/strong>, <strong>Blackpool 166<\/strong> and <strong>Oporto 273<\/strong> \u2013 trams very suited to the weather that was experienced \u2013 though the crew of <strong>166<\/strong> did get soaked as it was being put away!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a bonus to the normal article on the events of the Sunday of the Crich50 celebrations we now present an article from Jack Gordon. Jack, as well as being the editor of Tramways Monthly, was volunteering in the Workshop &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/?p=16466\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[55,8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16466"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16466"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16469,"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16466\/revisions\/16469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.britishtramsonline.co.uk\/news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}