
| News | Features | Comment | Fleet Lists | Gallery | Hall of Fame | Restoration | Tram of the Year | Diary of Events | Links | Message Board | Site Updates | About the Site | How You Can Help | Email us | |
| News...February 2006...News...February 2006...News...February 2006...News This Page was last updated Sunday 26 February 2006 |
| All the news carried on these pages is done so in good faith and the source is always quoted, normally with hyperlinks. If you have a correction to give us on a news story or have any additional news that can be added do not hestiate to email us . We are grateful for those people who have given us permission to use their images and news on this page. |
|
For all previous news pages click here to go to the new News Index page which provides links to news dating back to September 2002. Photos on this page: One of the trucks to be fitted to London United Tramways 159 in the workshops at Crich. (added 5 February 2006) |
|
News In Brief Blackpool:Brush 622 and Balloon 709 are the latest trams to be undergoing attention to their current liveries. 622 has been in the Paint Shop for a repaint whilst 709 has had its Sealife vinyls from last year removed. (26/2/06 - Paul Turner from Yahoo! Groups from Blackpool_Transport) DLR: A new DLR only ticket for local residents in Greenwich, Lewisham, Tower Hamlets and Newham for travel in zones 2 and 3 has been launched. The ticket, which costs only £1.50, is available from ticket machines at all stations in zones 2 and 3 but is not available for use from Tower Gateway or Bank. To aid people who have not used the ticket machines before the DLR are running a series of free weekly training sessions in both English and Bengali.(26/2/06 - DLR) Edinburgh: Leading developers on the Waterfront development have urged the city council and Scottish Executive to rescue the tram project. In a joint statement they said: “As owners and occupiers of 340 acres of land programmed for redevelopment, we share common concerns over the detrimental impact locally of any decision to scale down the long-established commitment to the construction of a tram line linking Granton to the city centre." (26/2/06 - The Scotsman) Edinburgh: The new rector of Edinburgh University has said that he will fight for a tram link to their campuses. The MSP for the Green Party Mark Ballard said that the plans for the third tram line of the city should still go-ahead. (26/2/06 - The Scotsman) ------------------------------------------------- Blackpool: Balloon 713 has been revealed in its new all over advert for Asda. Once again it has a white base coat with vinyls added for the supermarket. Balloon 718 is also in a white base coat awaiting application of its vinyls in a new advert for City Sightseeing. (19/2/06) Manchester: : From the start of the month Metrolink season tickets changed and can now be purchased from PayPoint terminals across the Greater Manchester region. The old versions were made of card and completed by hand. They were kept in a plastic wallet along with a photocard of the holder. The new version is printed on a PayPoint machine and is then placed in a laminated holder. The controversial aspect of these tickets is that a monthly ticket is now only valid for 28 days meaning that in a 31 day month there is a rise of 15%. (19/2/06 - Gordon Ferguson) ------------------------------------------------- Birmingham: An opinion article in Birmingham Evening claims that the business plan for the Metro extension to Five Ways via the city centre has not yet been presented to the government because of further cost concerns. The full opinion (it is the first subject on the page) can be found here. (12/2/06 - icBirmingham) Blackpool: Overhauled Balloon 713 which, as you may recall, operated from September last year in an all over white livery, is currently having an all over advert for the new Asda at Fleetwood applied. Once again it is 100% vinyled. (12/2/06 - Paul Turner from Yahoo! Groups Blackpool_Transport) Leeds: The National Audit Office are deciding whether to launch an investigation into the failed Leeds Supertram bid, which had spent around £40 million before rejection by the DfT. The investigation would look at whether public money was spent appropriately by the department. It would also examine claims that transport ministers met with a local bus company about alternative schemes before rejection the Supertram bid. (12/2/06 - BBC News Online) Liverpool: An “opinion” article in the Liverpool Daily Post says that now the tram dream is over in Liverpool that new thinkers are needed for developing a new transport strategy. The article, written fairly anti tram, also claims that a boss of a European transport company travelled the proposed route of the tramway to Kirkby and was so disappointed he pulled his company out the next day. To read the full article click here. (12/2/06 - icLiverpool) Manchester: Internally trams have started to have small frames fitted above the top of the driver’s door in the passenger compartment. They are presumed to be used for adverts but as yet none have been noted. Whitefield station is to receive a car park on the southbound side with a small wooded area recently being cleared. (12/2/06 - Gordon Ferguson) Manchester: As previously mentioned the transport interchange at the Shudehill tram stop has now opened. With the opening of the bus station at this location part of Corporation Street in the city centre is closed to traffic between 1000 and 1900. In the first week this caused bad traffic congestion in Moseley Street during the evening peak with northbound trams being delayed in service. This has since improved slightly. (12/2/06 - Gordon Ferguson) ------------------------------------------------- Birmingham: Midland Metro services were severely disrupted on Friday (3 February) following a car accident in the early hours of the morning. The incident saw a car smash into a wall in Monmore Green, Wolverhampton and saw two women in the car die. Metro services had to terminate at Priestfield with replacement buses put on from Wolverhampton St Georges whilst the incident was sorted out by the West Midlands Police. (5/2/06 - icBirmingham) Blackpool: Balloon 718 is currently in the Paint Shop for a new all over advert for its current sponsor City Sightseeing. 717 has had its old underframe removed and its new one fitted as part of its ongoing overhaul. The Talbot Square trackwork has now finished and work is now concentrating on the lifting and packing the sunken track at Central Pier. (5/2/06 - Paul Turner from Yahoo! Groups Blackpool_Transport) Crich: Chesterfield 7 has now been reunited with its truck but still requires some minor work. LUT 159’s trucks have arrived and one has been stripped down and the side frames sent away for cleaning and non destructive testing (checking for cracks). (5/2/06 - Andy Bailey) Edinburgh: Developers who are developing a 19th century office block into a guesthouse on Hopetoun Crescent have been informed they will not have to pay £40,000 towards the tram line because no more than five new residences will be created. (5/2/06 - The Scotsman) ------------------------------------------------- |



|
MERSEYTRAVEL BOW TO INEVITABLE: NO APPEAL ON MERSEYTRAM Sunday 26 February 2006 Merseytravel have bowed to the inevitable and have decided not to appeal the decision of the Judicial Review. The decision has been taken as time would run out to get Line One constructed in time for the Capital of Culture year with no date available for appeal until the end of this month. Cllr Mark Dowd, chairman of Merseytravel said: “We have reluctantly decided not to pursue the appeal, although our lawyers tell us we have a properly arguable case. It is simply a question of timing. We have been told that we could not get a hearing in the Court of Appeal before the end of February, which means it would be impossible to meet the timescales for Line One. We still believe in Merseytram. It is a positive scheme which could bring huge benefits to Merseyside and that is why it remains in the local transport plan." Neil Scales, Managing Director of Merseytravel, added: “The fact is that two independent inspectors have agreed with us that the tram is the right choice for that corridor. You can't do it with buses, you can't do it with a guided bus. We didn't decide to have a tram and work back. We looked at what was right for the people of Merseyside and worked forward. We've got the powers to build this line, as long as we start by February 2010. We've got a good project which is not funded but who knows what will be around in the next few years?" It has also been confirmed that one option they could consider in the future for construction of the tram is complete private funding.
2539 was heading for Elmers End on a Line One service from Wimbledon when the car, which was travelling south along Wellesley Road, collided with the tram causing extensive damage to the car, although the tram escaped with only minor damage. The driver of the car had to be cut out of his vehicle and was then airlifted to hospital. His condition was described as serious but stable.
A lengthy Police investigation took place at the scene whilst trams were turned at Reeves Corner and East Croydon. The incident took place at 1400 and services were allowed to go through the area again by 1800.
1402 people were questioned about whether NET should be extended and only 3% of these people said they didn’t want to see extensions, 7% were unsure and 10% said they didn’t care.
Other results from the survey show that passengers are 94% satisfied with the service and 98% would recommend the service to friends and family.
The most popular thing that would get people to use the tram more would be more frequent trams (49%) with other ways mentioned being a new type of ticket (22%), new bus routes to link the tram (19%), safety and security enhancements (18%) and better marketing or information (6%).
Colin Lea, Marketing Manager for NET said: “We actively seek regular feedback from our passengers to help us make improvements to our service. We are delighted that the tram is continuing to be so popular. We are always exploring ways to improve our service and this survey is very useful in pointing us in the right direction.”
The full results of the customer satisfaction survey can be found here.
Winter work continues on the Isle of Man's 3ft gauge Manx Electric Railway. The MER closed on the 2nd October for the winter to allow the demolition of Summerland complex next to the MER's main depot at Derby Castle to be completed, and a £1.5 million track renewal programme.
RMS Locotec, who have the track relaying contract this winter are using a 3ft gauge Rushton & Hornsby loaned from the Irchester Narrow Gauge collection to help with the work. The 6WDM Class 100-DL diesel–mechanical locomotive was built by Ruston & Hornsby Ltd, Lincoln, 1949. Works No. 281290 is powered by a 50 h.p. Gardner LW6A 6-cylinder diesel engine. She is one of a pair supplied to Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd in 1949 working in the Ufton Lime pits in Warwickshire. It was later transferred to the Kilvington Gypsum quarry in Nottinghamshire until closure of the operation in 1984. The locomotive was donated to the Northamptonshire Locomotive Group and arrived at Irchester in December 1984. It is now the sole survivor of its class, which were the most powerful narrow-gauge diesel locomotives to be built by Ruston & Hornsby.
The locomotive, now in RMS Locotec livery and carrying the name 'Bertie', was spotted just south of Ballagawne crossing on the Douglas – Laxey section near Garwick (4 ¾ miles from Douglas) last Saturday (18 February) hauling new rail from the road crossing access point to the relaying work close to the old Garwick station.
|
|
The diesel locomotive, now in RMS Locotec livery and carrying the name 'Bertie', is seen just south of Ballagawne crossing on the Douglas–Laxey section near Garwick (4 ¾ miles from Douglas) on Saturday 18 February hauling new rail from the road crossing access point to the relaying work close to the old Garwick station.
Photo: David Lloyd-Jones |
|
WORKS STARTS ON SUPERTRAM MALIN BRIDGE PARK AND RIDE Sunday 26 February 2006 Last Monday (20 February) saw the commencement of work on a new Park and Ride complex at the Malin Bridge terminus of Stagecoach Supertram. To celebrate the start of work there was an official “cutting of the first sod” ceremony on Tuesday (21 February). Roy Wicks, the Director General of the SYPTE, said: “There has been an increase in the number of customers using Sheffield Supertram in the Malin Bridge area, many of whom travel to the tram stop by car from places such as Stannington and Loxley. We hope by introducing over 100 park and ride spaces at the tram stop it will encourage more people to leave their car on the outskirts of the city centre rather than driving into work everyday. Park and ride sites are a convenient, good value and easy way to travel to work and means you don't have to worry about congestion." When completed the site will have space for 104 cars, including 7 for disabled users and 5 cycle stands. It will have CCTV cameras and a barrier controlled entrance and has been designed to achieve Park Safe standard. It will be fitted with good lighting and will have a riverside footpath around the edge of the site, along with seating. Cabinet Member for Transport and the Environment, Cllr Terry Fox, said: “I am confident that this Park and Ride facility will be well used. It offers motorists the opportunity of making their journey to work as stress-free as possible and gives them a very practical alternative on how they travel into the city centre." It is planned that the site will be ready to open in mid summer 2006.
Mr Darling told the Nottingham Evening Post: “I would hope for a decision within a matter of months and certainly, I would hope, during the course of the summer. The first part of Nottingham's tram line, which I opened in 2004, has been very successful."
He added that the DfT has held up a decision on funding because they are waiting for further information from the city and county councils – particularly on the funding issue.
Pat Armstrong, project leader for Nottingham Express Transit said: “It would be helpful to the people who have concerns over the project and want some certainty. And it would obviously be of importance to those who want to see the benefits. Also delay is costing money - the inevitable fact is that the costs go up the longer it is delayed."
Leeds 602 is still being prepared for a repaint, and it is hoped that this work may commence soon. Meanwhile, the condition of the tyres on the north truck of Blackpool Standard 40 is causing concern. It is hoped to lift the car and re-tyre the wheels on both trucks soon.
* Why not become a member of the Tramway Museum Society? As well as helping the future of trams in the UK you can get free entry to the museum as well as other benefits including a quarterly magazine and a monthly newsletter.
At the recent Judicial Review it emerged that Sir David Henshaw sent a report containing concerns about the financial implications of the tram to the government before senior councillors had seen it.
Cllr Anderson said: “The people of this city have a right to know what went on and I am convinced that they will be extremely annoyed that the chief executive's actions were not the actions of someone who supported the tram project. I ask that you give consideration to suspending the chief executive until there is a full and independent inquiry."
The leader of the Council, Cllr Bradley commented: “I am looking into this matter and awaiting legal advice on some of Cllr Anderson's comments. As far as suspending Sir David or his deal, that is not something I am considering at the moment."
Not unsurprisingly Sir David Henshaw declined to comment on the matter.
The council are currently redrawing their local transport strategy and have distributed thousands of forms through the capital asking for ideas. Anti tram campaigners want residents to use this form to let their feelings known on the trams.
* Meanwhile, Scottish Gas and Telford College have warned the City Council that they may be unable to recruit and retain staff and students if the tram line to Granton is not built on time. At the present time this line will only be built if other sections are completed on time and in budget.
Cllr Caunt met Cllr Gary Clarke, Chairman of the PTA and Cllr Roger Horton, lead member for Metro at the depot on Friday (17 February). After he received an initial introduction he got to drive a tram on a siding within the depot.
Cllr Horton said: “Cllr Caunt’s interest in driving a tram shows his enthusiasm for the Metro extension through the Dudley borough. The project is very important for transport and regeneration in the Black Country and having the ongoing support of Dudley Council is a great benefit for the scheme.”
Cllr Caunt signed an agreement for the extension of Midland Metro via Dudley town centre to Brierley Hill last month, to outline the authorities relative roles in the funding, construction, operation and maintenance of the route. Cllr Caunt said: “The Metro extension is a very exciting prospect for local people. The extended line will not only make travelling around the area much easier and more convenient for everyone, providing an attractive alternative to the car, but it will also bring regeneration, jobs and other socio-economic benefits to this part of the Black Country.”
Mr Scott revealed this at the Edinburgh Tram (Line One) Bill committee meeting held last week, where MSPs had the first chance to question the key players in the scheme since it was revealed it would be built in phases.
Mr Scott said after being questioned: “This is not a transport minister who is going to write an open chequebook or hold the chequebook in that way. This is someone who wants to make sure we get clarity about the numbers, we deliver what we say we're going to deliver and we do it in the timescale we've outlined."
He added that although he backed the Council’s plan to build the system in phases the Executive had only backed the scheme in principle so far. Final approval would depend on a robust business case – which should be completed by the end of the year.
At the same committee meeting it was revealed that completion of the two tram network could be delayed by 10 years – to 2020. The first phase of construction of the line from Leith to the Airport should be completed by 2010 if approval is given by the Scottish Executive but if funding is not in place the northern loop via Roseburn and Granton and a section from the airport to Newbridge could be delayed by 10 further years until that money is in place.
The loop between Roseburn and Granton Square should be built by 2015 at the latest (costing £75 million) but the £45 million stretch eastwards to Leith could be delayed by a further 5 years. The Newbridge section is also likely to be delayed too. It is hoped this will not be the case as there should be spare cash from the £55 million contingency fund for at least the loop.
Michael Howell, Chief Executive of tie, warned that if delays were incurred in construction of these additional lines costs could rise by 50%. He said that an additional £23 million may be added to the total cost if this happened.
Despite the Scottish Executive providing somewhere between £400 and £500 million and Edinburgh City Council £45 million there is still a funding shortfall. It is hoped that the gap will be plugged by applying for Executive grants and using profits from tram ticket revenue. It is also expected that contributions will be forthcoming from developers across Edinburgh.
As BRITISH TRAMS ONLINE has previously reported, Blackpool Council have put a £88 million plan on the table to upgrade the 11 and a half mile tramway from Starr Gate to Fleetwood. The articles in The Gazette mention just what this plan will include: The bid has been backed by both Blackpool Borough Council and Lancashire County Council and the North West Regional Assembly put the bid for funding into their plans back in January. The government are only being asked to provide 75% of the money (only £66 million) with the council’s committed to finding the remaining £22 million from other sources.
It has also been revealed that if the upgrade plans are thrown out by the DfT the tramway will only run between Bispham and Pleasure Beach – meaning £2million would have been wasted on track replacement in the Little Bispham and Fleetwood areas in the last few years.
Steve Burd, Managing Director of Blackpool Transport – operators of the tramway: “We're in a situation whereby parts of the tramway and the electrical infrastructure will only last for a few years. Government funding for a tramway upgrade is therefore essential. Without this funding it's inevitable the tramway will have to be reduced in terms of its total length over the next few years. The limited financial resources available will have to be concentrated in the core central area between Bispham and the Pleasure Beach. If something major goes on another section of track, it will lead to the closure of other sections."
If, and with this government it is a big if, the bid if approved by Alistair Darling, the new low floor trams would be used on a 10 minute headway all year long. They are also likely to be supplemented by a small fleet of heritage trams for a tourist route – but only if an exemption is given to the DDA which states all public transport vehicles must be accessible by 2020.
Philip Higgs, trustee of the Lancastrian Trust and a transport consultant commented about the use of heritage trams: “It would be similar to the way that while updating its buses to low floor models, London still retains some of its traditional Routemaster buses to use on heritage routes. Trams have a place in modern transport especially with fuel shortages. Electricity can be made from a number of sources. In any European city you will find an extensive tramway system."
Mr Burd added: “The bid has to demonstrate the tramway system isn't just used by visitors, but by locals as well, and if the service is enhanced to be low floor, it will encourage more people to use it. The council is very aware of the proposed impact of the masterplan. If regeneration is successful and we get a super casino, travel demand will increase even more. That's one of the reasons the tramway needs to be upgraded because the road system is unlikely to be able to cope with all the extra people coming into town."
Local MP Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) said: “I continue to make the arguments about the unique nature of the Blackpool tramway, both in terms of its existing importance to both tourists and residents, and its potential importance on the back of regeneration. I hope that delegates and ministers coming to the Labour Spring Conference will see first of all that although it's a very fine system, it's clearly in need of an upgrade. They can see for themselves that we are not exaggerating the need. In terms of cost, the social need and the fact we need to upgrade to offer full access for disabled people are all strong arguments. It's a working tramway and it's important we get that across so the ministers don't see it as something that if we can throw some Lottery money at it, that will do instead."
The final word goes to Mr Higgs: “It would be a brave politician who risked the future of the country's oldest electric tramway. Because Blackpool already has a tramway the actual cost of the bid isn't as significant as other bids that the government has declined for new systems. Without this funding the future of the tramway will be put in jeopardy. We're hoping it will survive in its entirety to celebrate its 125th anniversary in 2010. It has been listed as an icon on the government's website, and it is an icon, not only of Blackpool but of the country just as much as Big Ben or Yorkshire Pudding."
The two articles on the Blackpool Tramway can be read in full here and here.
* With the Labour Spring Conference in town it would have be a great opportunity for Blackpool Transport to put on extra services on the tramway to show delegates just what the tramway is about. Instead, in their wisdom, they decided to put Line 1 buses to transport extra passengers. Surely this shows the government that Blackpool can cope without the trams if they have a bus route which duplicates it?
Steve Barber, the chairman of BACIT, said: “It is affecting people who have a house along the route and there is a lot of development planned but everyone is waiting to see what happens. We have been getting the same line from Government for 700 days."
But any hopes of a decision coming soon from the government will appear to be quite quickly dashed. Prime Minister Tony Blair has written to Broxtowe MP, Nick Palmer, in response to a question. Mr Blair said: “Government needs to be as confident as possible at this stage about the proposed funding route and that, if the scheme were approved, the risks of subsequent increases in costs had been minimised. Once the additional information has been received, the Government will endeavour to reach a decision on granting Programme Entry as soon as possible."
The letter revealed that the DfT have asked for the dreaded further information from the councils before a decision was made. This “further information” was also requested from Liverpool and Leeds before their projects were thrown out. In fact many cynics may suggest that the request for more information is just a prelude for more delays and then a final rejection because “costs are too high” and can’t you do it so much cheaper with buses so we can use the money for something far more important like 10 more lanes on the M25.
The Blight-o-Meter can be found here and also shows several other broken promises from men in the government.
In addition to the blinds being replaced a new automatic next stop voice announcement system will be fitted which will use GPS to pinpoint the location of the tram. This system is similar to that which is being fitted to the trams on Stagecoach Supertram in Sheffield. The main reason is to cater for the proposed timetable change expected some when in 2006 due to the addition of the Centrale stop.
All the trams are to receive a modification to the operation of the passenger doors. In future once the doors are opened they will remain so for 2 minutes to avoid them closing on people or buggies. The driver will be able to close them before this time as well.
2538 is back in service following the damage sustained in the incident at New Addington although it will have to return to the workshops for attention to its driver door once other trams have returned to use. 2533 remains out of service awaiting parts before its own repairs can be actioned.
This news has some from the Unofficial Croydon Tramlink website, whose news service makes a welcome return following legal issues. For full news on the above stories and other news from the system including details on Operation Smart End
click here.
Cllr Will Brookes, Conservative transport spokesman was happy with the outcome and urged Ealing Council to bow to the inevitable: “This is a deeply unpopular scheme for good reason. It will make congestion worse not better in Ealing, and it will blight the lives of thousands of residents who will suffer from traffic diverted to outside their homes. As further details emerge it becomes ever more obvious that residents will not wear the chaos and disruption that Mayor Livingston wants to foist on us. Labour Hammersmith and Fulham Council recognises this and Conservative Hillingdon does too. We need Ealing Council to abandon its dogmatic faith in Ken Livingstone's pipe dream and stand up for local people."
However, Ealing Council cabinet member for transport and planning policy, Cllr Ray Wall, said: “Ealing Council will continue to support and promote the tram because of the very real benefits it will bring to the people of Ealing and west London. Given that half the tram's route as well as key destinations are in Ealing, with only smaller parts running through Hillingdon and Hammersmith and Fulham, it is important that Ealing continues to work with Transport for London as it is our residents that will be far more affected than those in neighbouring boroughs."
The deeply unpopular scheme now has Hillingdon, Kensington & Chelsea and Hammersmith & Fulham opposing it. It would link Uxbridge with Shepherds Bush and would cost £650 million to construct. Is it now time for Ken Livingston, Mayor of London, to concentrate on the Cross River Tram scheme?
Cllr Gary Clarke, chairman of the WMPTA said: “The Midland Metro is established as the most reliable form of public transport in the region, but the benefits to passengers is only a part of the story. This study visit will also stress the importance of an integrated transport system and how getting this right is vital to the future of all our towns and cities.”
The conference will take place next week (13-15 February) and has been organised by the Local Government Association at the Birmingham International Convention Centre. It will include a study tour of the Midland Metro tomorrow (13 February).
|
|
The trucks to be fitted to London United Tramways 159 have arrived at Crich as this view of one of them shows.
Photo: Andy Bailey |
|
JUDGE REJECTS MERSEYTRAM PLEA Sunday 5 February 2006 The Merseytram dream is surely now all over as the Judicial Review was this week rejected, without the opportunity for Merseytravel to even appeal. Mr Justice Sullivan threw out all three grounds of Merseytravel’s appeal after a dramatic hearing where it was revealed that former Chief Executive of Liverpool City Council – Sir David Henshaw – sent a copy of a report on the tram to the DfT before it had even been discussed with the city councillors. Mr Justice Sullivan gave his verdict in the case just 50 minutes after the conclusion of the evidence. In respect to the first appeal that Merseytravel had been given “legitimate expectation” that £170 million would be handed over if it met the conditions laid down by the secretary of state in December 2002 when the original offer was made. He said: “Any expectation in that letter would have been brought to an end when the bid was refused on June, 13, 2005." He continued: “The failure to meet the conditions cannot even be described as there being no letter from Wirral and a conditional one from Liverpool because by the time of the meeting in September, 2005, it was plain that all the local authorities either did not support the scheme or if they did, did so only on the basis that there was no cost to them." The second ground of appeal was that it was unreasonable for Mr Darling to leave it to the local councils to decide if Merseytravel was affordable rather than undertake an assessment himself. Mr Justice Sullivan commented: “It was not unreasonable for the minister to say it was for those who were going to be exposed to the potential risk to satisfy themselves as to its extent and its affordability. It seems to me that it has to be considered against the background of the minister's underlying concern that the local authorities (LAs) would come back for more (money) if there were cost overruns, which had indeed proved to be justified because, despite the letters from the LAs and the PTA, the LAs did indeed come back for more money at the September meeting." The final section of the appeal was that the minister had frustrated statute law in allowing the councils to veto on a transport issue, by requiring the letters of support from them, when Parliament had specifically given rights on transport to PTAs. In reply to this Mr Justice Sullivan said: “I don't accept the conditions were unlawful. It seems to be perfectly appropriate that the secretary of state should require a degree of local support and the LAs should be prepared to put their money where their mouths are and acknowledge that they may be liable for future costs.” Not unsurprisingly the DfT said they were happy with the outcome. A spokeswoman said: “We're delighted by the judgment and welcome the court's vindication of the department's decision." Although Mr Justice Sullivan said there was no leave to appeal the decision Merseytravel have said they plan to approach the Court of Appeal directly on the issue of Mr Darling had “frustrated statute law”. Neil Scales, Chief Executive of Merseytravel, said: “We were here more in sorrow than anger. We are a partner of the DfT in supplying transport to the people of Merseyside and I do not think they have anything to gain by going down that route. I am pleased with the way our advocate put our case and I believe we received a fair hearing. We wanted to make sure our points were fully aired and they were. We will go to the Court of Appeal and while we all know about the time-scale issue, there is still a chance for the tram." Merseytravel are now left with a legal bill estimated to be between £300,000 and £400,000. This could rise further if the DfT decide to seek punitive costs as suggested by their QC. The leader of Liverpool City Council, Cllr Warren Bradley, said: “We are hugely disappointed at today's High Court ruling. The city council has supported the tram and has done everything within our powers to keep this project on track - including stepping in with an £18m funding guarantee in a bid to save the scheme. It was clear the Government was not prepared to pay its fair share of funding for the tram and was determined to ditch it. They kept on moving the goal posts and placed unreasonable and unworkable demands on Merseytravel and the Merseyside councils at the very last minute. We have lost the opportunity of building a modern, clean, efficient and green transport system for Liverpool. I am seeking an urgent meeting with the Minister to ensure the £170m earmarked for Merseytram is not lost to Merseyside, and is made available for new transport schemes." It is now claimed in Liverpool that the city has been set back five years transport wise with its major part of the LTP now being axed. £56 million had already been spent on preparing for the construction of the line and this will not now be able to be got back following the rejection of the Judicial Review. Politicians in the region have now demanded to know what the Government plan to do with light rail. Louise Ellman, Labour MP for Riverside: “I want to know if the Government has lost faith in light transport schemes."
Badgers can be found in two areas of Phase One of the proposed system in the Scottish capital – near to the airport and along the Roseburn Urban Wildlife Corridor. There are our families of badgers in these locations and they will be protected by a network of bridges, tunnels and fencing across the tram lines.
The section of line going through Roseburn will only be built if it is affordable but the badgers near the airport will be affected if the Scottish Parliament approve the line. If the Roseburn line is not built only £208,000 will be needed for protection of badgers.
Scottish National Party Councillor, Steve Cardownie said: “This appears to be quite expensive, and we could probably relocate the badgers and put them in a penthouse in Leith for a quarter of the price. Nevertheless, the law has to be complied with."
Cllr Lawrence Marshall added: “Spending this cash is something we have to do, but the Roseburn corridor was never created for badgers or cyclists - it was created for transport use."
These figures have been obtained by the Edinburgh Evening News under the Freedom of Information Act and also reveal: The area co-ordinator for the Edinburgh and Lothians Badger Group, Tricia Alderson, added: “It is TIE's choice to put the trams through the Roseburn corridor, and it isn't a necessity. They have not properly investigated putting the lines on roads."
West Midlands PTA chairman, Cllr Gary Clarke said: “We are always keen to look at innovative ways of providing better public transport - and this new technology could prove to be just the answer for maintaining a vital link.”
PPM railcars make use of a revolutionary “Kinergetic” propulsion system to store and re-use the braking energy of the vehicle. This is, according to the inventors, a very environmentally friendly system as the 50 passenger 10 tonne railcar can run for over an hour on just a few litres of propane fuel, with low noise and imperceptible emissions. The PPM is also fully compliant with safety and accessibility regulations.
The service will run four times an hour and is the first time since 1915 that the line has had a service on Sundays. The PPM will carry out a trial for 12 months and is expected to be keenly observed by key figures in the rail industry to see if this is the way forward for community rail lines.
It is being part supported by Centro who have given £35,000 funding for the year long trial.
Transport Edinburgh Limited (TEL), a new body made up of Lothian Buses, tie and the city council, has been set up to oversee the integration of trams and buses on the streets of Edinburgh. This company will own both buses and trams, with all the profits being collected under the one roof to avoid competition.
The study revealed that at least 31 buses an hour will be removed from service in bust areas like Leith Walk. The airport bus link is also likely to be cut by 50%. Lothian Buses have also insisted in the creation of two effective interchanges, one at the foot of Leith Walk and one at St Andrews Square to encourage people to change from bus to tram.
SNP councillor, Steve Cardownie, said: “I have received assurances that the bus company will not be run down or used to prop up the trams financially. But if they are going to take off so many buses, then I have to wonder what their interpretation of 'run down' is. Trams will bring job losses in the bus industry, and there are a lot of other questions that need to be answered before funding is committed in summer."
Neil Renilson, chief executive of Lothian Buses and TEL, said: “There is no doubt that this tram scheme will be a major boost for the city from many perspectives. We need to avoid any unnecessary duplication of provision between trams and buses."
|